Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Wouldn't it be an idea (well, I suppose it's too late now, just > wondering what you think) to call it __cadd__ instead then?
If I were designing Pyrex over again, I might do something like that. But then people would expect __add__/__radd__ etc. to be emulated as well, and that would be very complicated to support. It would also be rather inefficient. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
