Hi Greg,
Greg Ewing wrote:
>> where the (IMHO much more obvious) cdef +
>> range() syntax is optimised
>
> Even in the presence of this optimisation, I don't consider
> that the integer for-loop syntax is entirely redundant.
Not redundant, no. But less calling for improvement.
> The 'for i from...' version was a compromise
I understand that. Still, having two spellings for "for ... in ...", one
for Python, one for C, looks better than a completely different syntax
that just starts with "for". So I vote for
for x in iterable:
and
for x in 1 < x <= 5:
instead of the new
for 1 < x <= 5:
purely for readability (and obviously keeping the old "from" spelling for
compatibility).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
