Carl Witty wrote:

> Then a construction like
>   show (read "x")
> is ambiguous,  By default, ambiguous types like this default to type
> Integer, but a particular module can specify a different default.

Hmmm, that's interesting -- I didn't know that it would
actually allow ambiguous constructs like that. I'm not
sure this is a feature that Cython ought to emulate --
seems to me it would be better to be explicit about *how*
you want to read the string. But maybe EIBTI isn't
considered part of the Zen of Haskell.:-)

-- 
Greg
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to