Hi, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > Then, why isn't the same approach used for the C name 'bar' for the > function pointer? Does this make sense in order to 'protect' the > Cython-generated definition to interact badly with stuff that could be > got #include'd before the point "xxxx_api.h" is #include'd ??
I think you just have to take care what you make public. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
