On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:40:57 -0600 "Brian Granger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, I think the actual parallel constructs should be kept out of > Cython proper. In general I think it is much better to develop > libraries, not new language syntax. Obviously, Cython itself is a > distinct language, but I think considerable effort must be made to > prevent feature creep. I am not against new features, but it is easy > to get carried away with these things. It is much more important to > make the existing features and syntax more robust. This is why most > successful languages develop in a rather conservative manner. I would > suggest a good way of evaluating new ideas is to ask to question "what > would Guido say?" Of course, Cython is not Python, but we all hope > the two don't stray far from each other. Could we make the cython language extensible/modifiable ? (Guido would definately say no to this..) Simon. _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
