Chuck Blake wrote:
>> This made my mind up: I do not think we should reinvent the wheel here.
> 
> This was just following up what Stefan seemed interested in.  It was just
> an alternative to using the far simpler use case of DEFINED which was
> merely if not DEFINED(foo) and bears little relation to C++ templates.
> You do seem to understand that from below, but I wanted to mention it
> more explicitly.

Yes, I was following up myself, I could have been more clear. For the 
record, I'm still +0 on Chuck's proposal.

-- 
Dag Sverre
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to