Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > If one decides to change the temp allocation flow altogether, I have > another proposal:
*And*, if that is done, there might be a lot of monotone but crucial work (tear it down and build it up), so we better have a coordinated coding session with IRC chat. I can put in two or three hours tomorrow. I am a bit scared of the prospect of implementing my own proposal though. Before changing the entire flow we need to schedule developer time so it doesn't get out of hand (Robert has some scary stories to tell about the SAGE "coercion" remake :-) arguably this change is isolated to 4000 lines in ExprNodes.py). The drawback with my proposal is that it doesn't seem easy to be backwards compatible, it needs tearing out and rebuilding stuff. Then again, without all the restrictions that are there on the current temp system (i.e. must allocate during analysis, trying to reuse temps in ways that should be much easier in a parent-manages-temp scheme) the problem seems to become a lot smaller than the problem the current complicated code has to solve. (I'm putting the string constant stuff on hold, this is more important.) -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
