On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Robert Kern >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> You might want to follow numpy's lead and define complex64 (float >>>> complex), >>>> complex128 (double complex), etc. >>>> >>> I really like your idea... Let's see what other people think about >>> this... >> >> Yes. Note that "double complex" typically means a complex with >> double- >> prec real and imaginary parts, not 128 bits. > > Right. numpy goes with the convention that the bit-width suffix is > the width of > the entire item, not the component real and imaginary parts for the > complex type.
Ah, good. Thanks for the clarification. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
