Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jan 8, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote: > >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> Thanks! I think this will help immensely for watching for memory >>> leaks in Sage. >> Yep, this is great. Given that Dag seems to have been slowed down by >> real world things I am curious what needs to be done to get this >> into a >> more usable state? Linux only is fine for me for now, but if this >> depeneds on 0.11-devel I would probably be not be able to use this. > > I am pretty sure it depends on 0.11-devel. In fact, it was written in > part *for* 0.11 as the temporary variable handle has been revised and > we want to catch any refcounting errors this may have introduced.
Sure, I am tempted to drop in 0.11-devel and see if it compiles the Sage library and if it then even starts Sage :). Hopefully 0.11 will come soon and we will find a way to integrate the refcount nanny as a special mode during doctesting of Sage, i.e. during compile time of Cython activate it and if we then somehow could have the doctesting framework have some mode where *every* reference was watched this would truly rock. If this is expensive performance wise it doesn't matter since it would be a special debug mode :) > - Robert Cheers, Michael > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev > _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
