Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> On Jan 15, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote: >> >> OK, I think it's because the ordering of #includes has been changed. >> I'm responsible for this--fixed some things, but apparently broke >> others. Well, at least I have somewhere to look now. > > Sage now compiles, a ticket is up at http://trac.sagemath.org/ > sage_trac/ticket/4987 > > Not all doctests pass, but it looks like it's in pretty good shape.
And having thought about the minpoly() issue a little more it now very much reminds me of the issue we saw at SD8.5 when the new-coercion-merge build on sage.math exhibited a mysterious segfault that only I was able to reproduce. Another thing was a mysterious doctest segfault that at some point magically went away and also involved a call to minpoly() in libSingular in a codepath that could have never been taken. > - Robert Cheers, Michael > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev > _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
