Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: >> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> >> >>> Neal Becker wrote: >>> >>>> I grabbed a NEW tar from http://cython.org/Cython-0.11.rc.tar.gz. (I >>>> won't comment on the confusion caused by changing the file without >>>> changing the name :) >>>> >>>> Now testing at least starts, but seems to have some errors: >>>> (Ignore the >>>> RPM build errors: >>>> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:, >>>> I'll fix those) >>>> >>>> >>> The problem is that NumPy appears to be installed on your system (import >>> numpy succeeds), yet the NumPy C header files is not present in the >>> include path. >>> >>> Either set an extra include-path using the INCLUDE environment variable: >>> >>> INCLUDE=/path/to/numpy/headers python runtests.py ... >>> >>> or, drop the NumPy tests from the test suite (as I suppose your Cython >>> RPM doesn't depend on NumPy -- it shouldn't!): >>> >>> python runtests.py ... -x numpy >>> >>> Dag Sverre >>> >> >> Here is code used to find the 'pyublas' includes. Something like this >> could be used to find the numpy includes: >> > Yep, but it won't happen in this release. See my upcoming response to > Lisandro. > > But I think the Cython RPM shouldn't depend on the NumPy RPM, or be > tested differently if NumPy is installed or not in the RPM build? > > Cython doesn't depend on NumPy in any way, there's just a test case > sitting there more for convenience than anything else...the testcase > doesn't add anything to correctness testing of Cython either. > > Dag Sverre
OK, I agree. I will use -x numpy and we avoid BuildRequires: numpy. With this, the build succeeds (on x86_64 F10). Anyone test this yet on gcc-4.4 (which is used for F11)? _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
