Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dag Sverre > Seljebotn<[email protected]> wrote: >> Just a note: I'm actually really, really happy if this happens, I'm just >> trying to refine it a bit :-) If numpy.pxd said >> >> ctypedef int? int16_t >> >> I would get a lot less questions about how it works... >> > > Did you mean "a lot more questions" ... ?
No, a lot less. I meant to say that I'm really happy if your proposal is implemented!, because then it will be more obvious what is going on, and I will get less questions about it, which is a good thing. > Well, let's stop this thread right now... I withdraw my proposal. Woah, deja vu... But please don't!! I shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of this; if you disregard all my comments I don't mind. Sorry if I made a bigger issue of this than it deserved. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
