Greg Ewing wrote: > Stefan Behnel wrote: > >> I would have thought that "PyObject" was a builtin type known to Cython by >> now, but it seems not. I found ticket #320 now, which I think is worth >> solving by making PyObject a builtin type. > > I'm not sure that's a good idea. I deliberately didn't make > it a builtin type in Pyrex, because if you're using the language > properly, you're not supposed to need it. I didn't want to > create an attractive nuisance that would let people fall > into the trap of using 'PyObject' when they should really > be using 'object'. > > IMO it would be better to think about how to enhance the > language to remove the need for using PyObject in the first > place.
Back to the "stolen"/"borrowed" reference support, then. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
