On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Oct 17, 2009, at 1:02 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>> Personally, I would prefer either 1) or 3), the latter likely being
>>>> more
>>>> convenient but potentially introducing new pitfalls elsewhere (to be
>>>> seen).
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>> I'm for (2) or (3), with a preference for (2). Option (1) will break
>>> code (which I'm strongly against) and (3) seems prone to pitfalls as
>>> you mention.
>>
>> Yes, I also prefer (2). Anyway, I'm not going to implement it ;-) ...
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention: (2) is mostly implemented now, with a few
> remaining quirks where the relaxed code became a bit too lax.
>
> http://hg.cython.org/cython-devel/rev/8d8cc4c9b91b
> http://hg.cython.org/cython-devel/rev/b0bb4d405755
>

You see, I wasted my time trying to save your time ;-) Many Thanks!



-- 
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to