Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.11.2009 05:04: > Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> 2) support writing utility code in Cython (does this work already?) >>> * likely just compile TreeFragments inside of the utility_scope? >>> (does the utility_scope actually have a unique mangling prefix >>> or will it interfere with a user provided "utility" module?) >> >> I am in a hurry and am going to be for another two weeks, so I'll just >> answer this: This is partly implemented in the kurt-gsoc branch. I'm >> hoping to do some work on getting that merged in December. > > partly = It does work, but perhaps not exactly as you'd want it > (string-based rather than TreeFragment, though that is easily changed).
I don't currently think we need to do any replacements if we use a dedicated builtin generator class, so a string based approach should work just fine. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
