On 12 April 2010 03:24, Greg Ewing <[email protected]> wrote: > Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > >> Still not sure, but we have to large dicts in PyrexTypes, that smells >> to unnecessary duplication. > > And I discovered that the other one wasn't being used any > more in Pyrex and eliminated it -- you might want to > check whether the same is true in Cython. >
Wow! Yes, I'm looking at your changes right now... I think I'll back-port them.. Just a little comment on your patch: you defined this: # Signedness values UNSIGNED = 0 NOSIGN = 1 SIGNED = 2 # Longness values SHORT = -1 NOLEN = 0 LONG = 1 LONGLONG = 2 That very nice, so... Why not take advantage of them to define all the c_xxx_type instances? -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
