Craig Citro, 22.04.2010 08:54:
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>> +1. I don't think it really interferes with the idea of transforms; it's
>> more like going only half the way because it is less likely to break the
>> code.
>
> I'm also +1 on this -- in general, I'm happier to see the tree get
> modified when you know it needs to be rather than try to "leave a
> note" and do the right thing later. Also, there currently seems to be
> a mix of behavior for analyse_types (i.e. most seem to just use
> side-effects to get the job done, but a few return values) -- it would
> be nice if these ended up being uniform.
 >
>> If somebody is preparing 0.13 for release then that somebody will have
>> to comment on whether it should wait until after the release though.
>
> I'm currently actively working on the 0.13 release. Stefan, have you
> started already writing the code? If not, or if you're just starting,
> I'd say we should wait until after the release ...

Nothing started yet, so it looks like the plan is to release 0.13 and do 
the refactoring after that.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to