On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cool, thanks for the report. I heard second hand that Cython was a > common topic at SciPy in Texas last week too.
There is no question whatsoever that Cython is a *major* piece of the puzzle for scientific/numerical work in Python, and I think every single one of us is both grateful for the great work you guys have done, and rooting for you to be able to continue successfully. The discussions I had at Scipy2010 with Kurt on weave (following up on the conversations with Robert) were a small example of that, as we all see Cython replacing the disparate set of tools we've had for low-level language access with a well integrated machinery via Cython that exposes C, C++ and Fortran in the most consistent way possible. Cheers, f _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
