> See http://wiki.cython.org/pure > > It's not as developed as we'd like it to be, but at least it is a proof > that we have the same aims that you have :-) And any help in this area > in general is very much appreciated; it wouldn't need to be using the > current syntax if something else is much better.
it looks quite nice, except that it hardcodes a name. Is there a Python cython module with Python source code that keeps code working with CPython? >> But as I said, it will be merely "correct" code generated. It won't be >> actually better code yet. But it will e.g. demonstrate a way to easily >> handle generator expressions and functions, something I believe Cython >> still doesn't do? >> > Closures (inner functions) are present in the next release (0.13). > Generator expressions are expected to land sometimes in the next half > year to a year, I think, though always take such estimates with a grain > of salt. Well yes, I am adequately proud that my compiler does not only do closures, but generator expressions and generator functions as closures, classes with closures, and meta classes. All of that. And I find Python without to be not the same language nearly. Yours, Kay _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
