Kay Hayen, 07.09.2010 18:24: > Am 07.09.2010 10:27, schrieb Stefan Behnel: >> Kay Hayen, 07.09.2010 00:15: >>> I may be misunderstanding people >>> because of my different goal to stay close to CPython. >> >> You may want to keep the level of unnecessary FUD down, especially on this >> list. Cython has very good and seamless support for Unicode and CPython's >> string type semantics. > > What you quoted was not a statement about Cython, but about me.
Hmm, guess I misunderstood you then. Sorry. You keep talking about "different goals" in contexts where it's not clear to me how Cython and Nuitka differ in their goals. (but let's don't discuss this in this thread) > Therefore I might not understand that the discussion is about "Cython C > string literals", because I don't understand what that should be and why > it should be technically. It's what you get when, for example, you write a string literal as input to a C function that accepts a char*. It's basically a Python bytes string mapped into C space, or an "unboxed" bytes string. Cython does these things in order to talk to foreign code. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
