>
> Our problems would be highly reduced if setuptools knew about Cython,
> simply by doing "have_cython_or_pyrex" instead of "have_pyrex", same
> for distutils. If one of the core developers can push for that simply
> acceptance, then wonderful.

FWIW, that's exactly what's broken in distutils. The very fact that
setuptools needs to know about cython *is* the issue. Because later,
you will have issue because of distribute instead of setuptools, and
then distutils2, and who knows.

cheers,

David
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to