Robert Bradshaw, 03.11.2010 08:52: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Ok, then let's support arbitrary expressions for read-only properties and >> self-attribute-only expressions for normal (getter+setter) properties. >> >> Should it be >> >> property x from readonly expr >> >> or >> >> property readonly x from expr >> >> ? I lean towards the first, once again due to the simpler grammar. >> >> Then we get >> >> property x from readonly anyexpr >> >> and >> >> property x from self.attribute >> >> (i.e. "from" followed by a dotted name, which may be "readonly", which >> would then be followed by an arbitrary expression) > > Sound good to me. It's possible that index expressions could support > setters as well.
Hmm, right, and they may really make a useful feature. That'll be trickier to test, though, as it can no longer be done that easily in the parser (I think). Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
