2010/11/27 Stefan Behnel <[email protected]>: > Stefan Behnel, 27.11.2010 09:26: >> Vitja Makarov, 27.11.2010 09:17: >>> 2010/11/27 Stefan Behnel: >>>> Vitja Makarov, 27.11.2010 08:24: >>>>> Also lambda function is defined in module methods table as >>>>> __pyx_lambda_funcdef4lala_lambda1, >>>>> Is it safe not to add lambda cname to pyfunc_entries in >>>>> Scope.declare_lambda_function()? >>>> >>>> I don't know, you can try. In any case, it needs to do everything that a >>>> normal Python function does, except for adding its Python name to the >>>> defining scope. That's a rather small distinction. >>> >>> Seems to work fine. No regressions. >> >> Ok. IIRC, lambda functions are already kept in a different list. I wonder >> if that was a good idea. Maybe a flag right on the DefNode would have been >> a better way to do it. > > Rethink this a bit, a flag on the entry seems more useful here... >
I think so too ;) Btw more generic flag will be needed someday. -- vitja. _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
