2011/5/23 Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>: >> >> Then again, "del x" would be a more obvious way to spell this ... > > And then setting it to NULL would actually be correct. >
That is already done ;) But usually you wouldn't use del statement in your code. > In any case, I'm -1 to deleting references once their no longer used, > we must wait 'till the end of the function, and I'm not sure the > savings would be that great either. > Ok. Example with char * makes me think that this is not a good idea. > In terms of packing/unpacking the variables onto the local C stack, > until we have live variable analysis (and even then) it may still be > more expensive in some cases than just leaving it there, right? > We can try, that isn't hard to implement and compare. -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
