On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 January 2012 19:10, Fernando Perez <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:37 AM, mark florisson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On a side note, ipython is not something I usually trust to test >>> things out, as it gets things wrong sometimes which can seriously make >>> you question your own sanity. >> >> I should note that we'd love to know specifics about problems that >> severe. Without a concrete report it's impossible for us to fix a >> problem, unfortunately, and a vague statement like this only serves to >> spread the notion "ipython is bad, for reasons unspecified". > > Apologies, it was indeed a rather vague comment. I had some issues > with pasting unicode characters a few years back that would get > incorrect codepoints in ipython but not regular python, but I'm afraid > I don't have any concrete report. As such I withdraw my comment, I > just wanted to mention that if something smells iffy it might be a > good idea to resort to regular python. > >> Also, since I know some core Cython devs are also heavy sage users, >> and the sage command-line is actually ipython, having an issue at the >> intersection of cython/ipython is problematic for all sage users >> working at the terminal. So we'd really like to make the >> cython/ipython combo as robust as possible. >> >> I certainly don't expect everyone to use ipython, and obviously when I >> see something that looks really bizarre, I double-check with plain >> Python first, as ultimately that is our reference and regressions from >> plain python are automatically bugs for us. >> >> But I have to say that it's been a very long time since I have >> encountered a situation where ipython produces something completely >> absurd, and if it happens to you, by all means please let us know, so >> we can try to fix it. >> >> Best, >> >> f >> _______________________________________________ >> cython-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
To reproduce the problem you'll want to use the specific pandas SHA (99e2eec) that I referenced there. The pandas bug in the issue has been fixed since then. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
