[There is no need for language like that in the subject!, it is against the code of conduct for a start!!!]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:38:48PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > There's a problem, you don't explain what on this picture is porn or > what at least is sexist. That guy's girlfriend wasn't happy, (maybe it is her own insecurities) but still, it is an indication that who thought of that wallpaper should think about "appropriate content" in context. Google: couchdb sexist For an incident that caused quite a stir back in 2009. Your partner wearing lingerie at home in the bedroom is perfectly OK, but not OK at work. Same as that picture is OK on a school kids luncbox but not as a DEFAULT login wallpaper -- some people may even object if it was one of several choices and not even the initial default. I wouldn't call it porn by a longshot, just a schoolkids fantasy in the wrong context. > How about "Reply-To: [email protected]"? To > get this off-topic from this list? What! [email protected] should have THEIR OWN offtopic list. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ D-community-offtopic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
