On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:03 +0100, "Morel Bérenger" wrote: > Le Mar 12 février 2013 19:25, Chris Bannister a écrit : > > i.e. http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/tmp/scr124thumb.png > At least, now I "understand" the subject. > > But guys... Are you serious about that? > *This* image can be considered porn?
It's absolutely not porn, but the girlfriend of a Linux audio user mailing list member made this guy claiming this on the list. It should be sexism and pedo-porn. > The girl's position is not even highly provocative. The only sad point > about that image, is that it is not really a beautiful one :D (tastes and > colors, anyway...) That's funny, since I like comic art and also mangas, I don't like the colors too :D. I agree that no distro ever should use such colors, if they do it again in the future, they should be banned from the Linux community forever ;). > Well, I know, all over the world we have various perception about moral > things, but be serious, please, or give me a serious, modern, definition > of pornography. I asked for this several times too. > Ok, in certain countries, girls with even eyes visible are > immoral, but should we really come to that extremism on mailing lists > dedicated to freedom? When I was talking about the burka I felt as if I trapped into some kind of Godwin's law. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ D-community-offtopic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
