On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> Again, I believe that AutoCommit is named almost backwards, and
> that we
> need a new ExplicitTransactions property.
AutoCommit has nothing to do with transactions. All it is
designed
to do is control the additional commit() call that some backends
require after data is changed.
If you are using transactions under programmatic control, then there
is no reason whatsoever that you would want this behavior, and so you
would set AutoCommit to True to tell Dabo not to add the additional
commit() call. I realize that this may not be the optimum name, which
is why I took the time to explain the derivation of the behavior and
how it came to be a property, and why I said that I think that a
discussion of a better name would be welcome.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
