On Thursday 23 August 2007 15:16, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 23, 2007, at 6:03 PM, johnf wrote: > > Uwe, I use Postgres daily. What was Ed's guess? All the forms we > > have were > > working correctly until Ed made this major change. Now none of > > forms that > > have children work. The isolation level has not changed. In fact > > nothing > > has changed as far as the DB is concerned. > > These changes were necessary in order to allow transactions to work > properly. The fact that your forms were working before simply meant > that you were not using explicit transactions. Also, it is more than > likely that with implicit transactions, you could get non-ACID > commits; IOW, the parent would save and commit, but then the child > save could fail, leaving you with an incomplete transaction that you > would have no way to roll back from. > > I'm sorry that this is slowing you down, but it is necessary if we > want to ensure data integrity. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com
Thanks Ed I understand. I am not saying revert! What I'm asking for is some detail information on how it is suppose to work (in other emails). In this email I was responding to Uwe's question on isolation level and the fact he (Uwe) thought I wasn't using Postgres. At the moment I think there is something wrong with my code. Just tell me how it's suppose to work from Dabo. Please assume any required dbPostgres.py methods are present. -- John Fabiani _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
