Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 22, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> This idea sounds reasonable to me. Ed? > > > I haven't seen this happening, so I'm not sure what sort of problem > it is we're trying to fix here. > > The after* methods should all be called before the release of their > object.
I can see the possibility of cases where you issue self.callAfter(), and the function gets registered fine, but then when it comes time to execute the function the object is dead. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
