On Thursday, May 17, 2012 08:32:57 PM Paul McNett wrote: > On 5/17/12 5:33 PM, John Fabiani wrote: > > Rev 1744 is the last time my code worked as expected. But I'm not > > completely concerned with what is broken - but what I perceive as a new > > requirement - providing the data structure for bizobjs. > > r1744 was back in 2006. Really? > > DataStructure is advised, but I never intended for it to be required. > > Paul
oops - 7144 OK - but I think it is at the moment. Why shouldn't it be? Yes we will have to change a number of supporting programs but if it makes the framework perform better and is much more stable shouldn't that be required? ClassDesigner, AppWizard and a few other areas will require changes. But it all can be done. I believe all the supported databases provide enough information to automate the task of creating the data structures for the bizobjs. I'm not sure about SQLite??? I may be completely wrong here - but it seems like a lot of effort (over the years) has been directed at determining the simplest of things like a python data type. The framework could assume that the python data type was present from the start - if the data structure was present. I'm not sure how this would effect dynamic SQL statements or the use of datasets. But to me all this effort to determine a python datatype should signal that we are doing something wrong. Johnf _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/17370346.Gm6oE3pFuD@linux-12
