Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >>> Shouldn’t.. >>> def _getSaveNewUnchanged(self): >>> try: >>> ret = self._saveNewUnchanged >>> except AttributeError: >>> ret = self._saveNewUnchanged = False >>> return ret >>> >>> Be.. >>> def _getSaveNewUnchanged(self): >>> try: >>> ret = self._saveNewUnchanged >>> except AttributeError: >>> ret = False >>> return ret >>> ? >> Yes, that would be better so it doesn't need to look for the missing >> attribute each time. Do you have/want commit access to dabo to make >> such >> changes yourself? > > Paul, I think you're reading his message backwards. The top version > is the current version, and it sets the attribute so that the > exception is only caught once. Larry is proposing the bottom version, > which doesn't set the attribute, and which will fire the except code > each time.
Yep, you are right, I had it backwards. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
