Użytkownik Ed Leafe napisał: > On Sep 23, 2010, at 11:23 AM, John Fabiani wrote: > > >> I see your EOT. However, I'd like to offer my .02. It's true that the use >> of >> iterator differs from python. But coming from a database perspective it also >> applies. And I believe that's exactly what Ed was thinking when he named the >> bizIterator. Coming from the database world I new exactly what it did just >> by reading the name. I don't believe anywhere it is suggested that the >> bizIterator is a python iterator. I think you assumed that it was. Where I >> assumed it was a way to read each row from a dataset. >> > Exactly. bizIterators are convenience items. If someone has a better > name for them, even though they are true Python iterators, feel free to > suggest one. >
Yes I did assume that bizobj iterator is the same as Python iterator. If I was wrong, sorry for that. Now it's clear for me. But I still see no sense in such iterator and in multiplying iterator entity existence. Could you show me an example, where current iterator approach is better than Python approach, please? -- Regards Jacek Kałucki _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
