Automated smoke report for 5.9.5 patch 31729
pc09: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.70GHz (GenuineIntel 1695MHz) (i686/1 cpu)
    on        linux - 2.6.18.8-0.5-default [SuSE]
    using     ccache gcc version 4.0.2
    smoketime 2 days 21 hours 53 minutes (average 4 hours 22 minutes)

Summary: FAIL(X)

O = OK  F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during:       - = unknown or N/A
c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep

   31729     Configuration (common) none
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
O O O O O O 
O O O O O O -Duse64bitint
O O O O O O -Duselongdouble
O O O O O O -Dusemorebits
O O O O O O -Duseithreads
X O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
X O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
O X O O O O -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
| | | | | +- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8 -DDEBUGGING
| | | | +--- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
| | | +----- PERLIO = stdio  -DDEBUGGING
| | +------- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8
| +--------- PERLIO = perlio
+----------- PERLIO = stdio

Locally applied patches:
    DEVEL
    SMOKE31729

Failures: (common-args) none
[stdio] -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
[stdio] -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
    ../ext/threads/shared/t/waithires.t.....FAILED at test 17

[perlio] -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
    ../ext/threads/shared/t/waithires.t.....FAILED at test 35

MANIFEST did not declare 'merijn/Configure'

Compiler messages(gcc):
pp_sys.c:307: warning: 'S_emulate_eaccess' defined but not used
op.c: In function 'Perl_fold_constants':
op.c:2332: warning: variable 'curop' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
opmini.c: In function 'Perl_fold_constants':
opmini.c:2332: warning: variable 'curop' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 
'vfork'

-- 
Report by Test::Smoke v1.19_88 build 1052 running on perl 5.8.8
(Reporter v0.027 / Smoker v0.032)

Reply via email to