>Discussion on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reports on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You have this backwards. (I am speaking of the actual implementation on the server.) The list is 'daily-build' The alias is 'smokers'. >Now the BIG problem is these aliases, and I get the feeling that all people >concerned are in favour of eliminating one of the aliases. As it stands one >can subscribe to both aliases of the *same* list, which IMHO is _wrong_. I >can live with the two (base)names, but one should not be able to subscribe to >what is basically the same list twice (although the have different >names). One should not be able to subscribe to both. The way the smokers aliases are setup, you _cannot_ subscribe under that name. The smokers aliases are there to keep people happy, thats all. (I've tested this - none of the smokers-subscribe type addresses will work. You will get a bounce message back referencing instructions for daily-build - the way it should be.) >NO, WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE THE NAME DISCUSSION! WE NEED A *TECHNICAL* >SOLUTION! >[ Sorry for shouting! ] Yes. Use the "real name" of the list. daily-build. > >> > So do i follow the usual procedure to subscribe? >> empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -R (your friendly perl.org admin)
