On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:29:04PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Thu 30 Jan 2003 13:24, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > > p5p: where are our bounds if we are to support this in general? > > > > 1: I don't think we can > > -e '/^#.*<[a-z][-a-z ]*>/d' there's going to be Unicode in one of them soon, so I think that you're going to need \w in there. Oh $expletive. But that's sed, isn't it, not perl? > > 2: I think that gcc generating programmatic output (not human output) that > > varies depending on locale is a bug in gcc, and should be reported as > > such. > > Agree. > > > (I admit that I've not thought fully about either answer) > > Do you ever? <duck> Well, sometimes I spend more than 60 seconds. I did think enough to delete my original thought from the message (which I now realise I should just have rot13ed: Naq vs gurl qba'g nterr gung vg'f n oht, jr whfg xrrc fraqvat gurz arj genafyngvbaf bs 'shpxvat fghcvq' hagvy gurl trg gur zrffntr shpxvat fghcvq ) Nicholas Clark
