[ Posted to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as my point of view on this matter ] Op een zonnige zomerdag (Tuesday 09 September 2003 20:57), schreef Nicholas Clark:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:16:33AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > Did this report still report as spam? Probably not, with a lot of > > non-capitals in the error section, but was the 1.8 removed from the From: > > expression? > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=7.0 > tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,GAPPY_TEXT,MIME_LONG_LINE_QP,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,S >PAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 No, it's not showing up as spam. Not sure > what's changed to make the score so much lower. Bugger all! I'm not going to jump through hoops in order satisfy some spamfilter and get it to accept messages that are accepted by the community and have grown that way with their approval. Either teach the spamfilter to accept that or count me out! I mean that, if smoke-reports are a problem for the spamfilter to accept on the list created for the sole purpose of recieving them, we have a *big* problem and we need to re-assess the concept of smoke-reports, <daily-build-reports[at]perl.org> and the usefulness of Test::Smoke without an easy way to disclose its results! good luck, Abe -- Amsterdam Perl Mongers http://amsterdam.pm.org perl -wle '%_=qw(Just Just another Perl Perl another hacker hacker); print join" ",map$_{$_}=>sort keys%_'
