Op een grimmige herfstdag (Sunday 31 October 2004 13:08),schreef Nicholas
Clark:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 01:13:32PM +0200, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> > Any information I can provide to help solve these (I've already posted
> > the verbose testresults on p5p)?
>
> I couldn't find the output for darwin by searching - offhand do you know
> when you mailed it, or what the subject was?
>
> I'm wondering if I can recreate it on one of the iMacs at work.
Sorry, I probably never posted the darwin ones. I cannot reproduce them right
now from the commandline, so this is from the smokelog:
Extending failures with harness:
../t/io/dup.t ../t/io/open.t
# Failed at ../t/io/dup.t line 99
# Failed at ../t/io/dup.t line 100
# got undef
# expected '0'
# Failed at ../t/io/open.t line 237
Failed 2/2 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 3/134 subtests failed, 97.76% okay.
../t/io/dup.....FAILED tests 15-16
Failed 2/26 tests, 92.31% okay
../t/io/open....FAILED test 93
Failed 1/108 tests, 99.07% okay (less 1 skipped test: 106 okay,
98.15%)
Good luck,
Abe
--
(*) Before the testing posse is on my case :-) let me preempt them by
saying that fake networks don't really help here. You'll be testing
a fake network. That proves that the module worked on a fake network.
That's great. Like drinking decaffeinated.
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2001-11-22
