Thank you for the compliment. It took a lot of thought and work to get it that compact. :-)
Sereal is faster and more compact than other serialization options, both of which are crucial for cookies. I can't see a good case for supporting other options. Why do you ask? David On Jan 14, 2013 4:49 AM, "Nicolas R." <[email protected]> wrote: > really nice ! short and effective, there is a lot to learn from your code > on secure cookie storage > is there a plan to make sereal optional ? > > > 2013/1/9 David Golden <[email protected]> > >> FWIW, once someone ships a new Dancer 2 dev release with the recent >> session changes that were merged, I have the next generation of >> cookie-based sessions ready to go. >> >> https://github.com/dagolden/dancer-sessionfactory-cookie >> >> It's even more secure than Dancer::Session::Cookie was. >> >> David >> >> -- >> David Golden <[email protected]> >> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ >> Twitter/IRC: @xdg >> _______________________________________________ >> dancer-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dancer-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users > >
_______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
