On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: >> Also, I consider D2 to still be alpha quality. > > Can you please elaborate on which problems/bugs/etc. you ran into with Dancer2 > that make you say that?
It's not stable. The API and internal architecture is still a work in progress. E.g. look at the 0.11 changes to redirect and forward. These *are* improvements (fixing the regressions that broke saving sessions in a hook), but the overall rate of change is still high enough that I deem Dancer2 "alpha" quality. David -- David Golden <[email protected]> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdg _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
