On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, VinceW wrote:
On 09/12/2014 03:58 PM, Sawyer X wrote:
I don't think "ports" actually means "porting", but the FreeBSD ports
system. It means "a package of the following for FreeBSD."
Yes. Sorry for the "DSL" :-)
that was my interpretation also. Debian has also it's own package system. I can
think of other distros too.
Should module packages for various distribution go on this list, or create
another one for that information?
The latter has my preference, there are so many distributions, I think it's
worth a list on its own :-)
The FreeBSD ports collection is not a distribution but *is* a list on its own.
I can do the magic, from source, optional dependencies, custom packages.
portable in comparison table was meant to mean: can a module for D1 be ported
to D2 or vice versa
In D1 I am missing
https://metacpan.org/pod/Dancer2::Plugin#on_plugin_import
and the my $dsl = shift;
[snip]
Port: p5-Dancer2-0.141000_1
What to do with them?
- First: upgrade to 0.150000
- Next: Make a "FreeBSD port" for
https://metacpan.org/pod/Dancer2::Plugin::DBIC
Can't live without DBIC :-)
--
Henk
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
