Hi Andy I've got about the same memory usage per starman process. FWIW I keep different apps on different (smaller) servers. The pricing is comparable and I feel it's easier to upgrade/install Perl modules for one app without worrying about the impact on the other ones.
Andrew On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Beverley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi dancers, > > I'm trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" value in terms of memory > use of Dancer2 running under Starman. I realise this is a "how long is a > piece of string" question, but I would appreciate some replies to make a > comparison. > > I'm finding it's roughly 100MB per worker, which seems to be roughly the > case regardless of the application. What do other people's run at? Is > there any way I can reduce the memory use and/or where should I look to > do so? > > I'm running 10 different Dancer2 applications on a VPS with 4GB of > memory. Each application has 2 Starman workers. This is about the limit > of what I can run before the memory on the server tops out. > > I'd like to get more applications per server. The applications generally > have fairly light-utilisation, but my VPS provider has disabled swap > space, so they can't be swapped out when they're not being used > unfortunately. > > Thanks, > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > dancer-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users > -- Andrew Solomon Mentor@Geekuni http://geekuni.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/asolomon
_______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
