Ok, thanks, I do not see this point.
In this cas this code must be acceptable ?
my $ip;
if ( request->remote_address() eq "127.0.0.1" ) {
my @list_ip = split(",", request->header('x-forwarded-for') );
$ip = $list_ip[0];
} else {
$ip = request->remote_address();
}
bye
Hugues
Le 22/04/2015 18:34, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Hugues <[email protected]> wrote:
if ( request->remote_address() eq "127.0.0.1" ) {
$ip = request->header('x-forwarded-for');
} else {
$ip = request->remote_address();
}
debug "My ip : ". $ip;
it's ok now
[110804] debug @0.260742> [hit #34]My ip : 192.168.0.19 in /home/git/
No, if the request to your apache already had an x-forwarded-for, you
will have multiple comma-separated ips.
I try with and without
behind_proxy: true
I don't see difference
Looks from the doc like that does something different.
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users