2015-10-31 0:56 GMT+02:00 Warren Young <[email protected]>: >> Session::Simple ... >> is not meant for production. > > That’s only true if “production” means a cluster of computers, or if you need > sessions to survive a restart of the Dancer app.
Docs says, it is meant for testing purposes only. >> And I think, it had some bugs too. > > It’s working fine for us. > > Maybe you’re referring to the fact that it’s essentially single-threaded, > which means you have to use it with a single-threaded > HTTP server on the Dancer side. (e.g. HTTP::Server::Simple::PSGI instead of > Starman.) Yes, it was something like that. When I started app with multiple workers, they don't share session data. So it was meaningless. But your explanation give me good ideas, how Session::Simple would be still very useful. Thank you for sharing. Wbr, -- Kõike hääd, Gunnar _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
