On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Alex Mestiashvili <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[email protected]> > wrote: >> In general, threads and Perl and efficiency are a pick-at-most-two >> proposition. Most people are content with forking. But I would love to >> hear details of counter-examples. > > There is an opinion that threads and processes are almost the same from the > performance point of view: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/807506/threads-vs-processes-in-linux
Yes, that's the picking threads and efficiency and leaving out the Perl route :) _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
