On Dec 26, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Sawyer X <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is awesome, Warren!
Glad to hear it. It’s too bad the advent project fizzled this year. Maybe you’ll pull them into next year’s calendar. > I can probably give an entire talk or a series of articles on why the > context object was problematic and why it was useful. Mickey and I > spent over 4 full days of hacking to completely remove the context > object[1]. It was 48 separate commits! My context() function isn’t the same thing as the D2 Context object. This article series is a distillation of experience with a D1 app, translated post hoc into D2 code. I evaluated D2 about a year and a half ago, rejecting it because I couldn’t get something working right. (I don’t remember what it was.) I remember deciding to provide a thin mimicry of D2’s old Context object in our D1 code. Replacing context() in our app with direct DSL calls dropped 400 SLOC, so I guess it wasn’t such a good idea after all. :) _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
