On Aug 26, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:18:24PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> 
>> A few participants suggested that the folk running the IETF
>> infrastructure monitor for $something when enabling this. AFAIR,
>> $someone[0] was supposed to provide some things to monitor for?
> 
> If they implement in stages:
> 
>  - The first step is to configure a suitable self-signed certificate
>    for the SMTP server and enable STARTTLS.  


I received a reply from the AMS folk (who, as always, are friendly and helpful)
Part of the delay[0] is that the IETF server infrastructure is in the process 
of being upgraded.
New machines are being deployed, and then there will be some config / tuning / 
testing. Hopefully the new stuff will be ready sometime mid-September, and then 
we can continue.




> Some small fraction
>    of SMTP connections will fail the TLS handshake.  Generally the
>    sending system will fallback to plaintext and deliver anyway.
>    One can monitor the logs to identify any systems that consistently
>    fail to establish a TLS connection, and gather statistics on the
>    source IPs and frequency.
> 
>  - The second step is to publish corresponding TLSA RRs (either
>    3 1 1 for a self-signed cert, or 2 1 1 if they elect instead to go
>    with some issuing CA).  At this point one can monitor for any changes
>    in the frequency of failed TLS sessions.
> 
> 
> It should also be noted that some (for example Postfix) SMTP clients
> will not abort the TLS handshake when server authentication fails.
> Rather, the TLS handshake will be completed, and the client will
> send a "QUIT" to gracefully close the session at the SMTP layer.
> Therefore, they should also monitor for connections that close
> gracefully without delivering any mail.

Cool.

W
[0]: Yeah, it's a tiny bit -- the huge majority is me getting sidetracked and 
not, you know, actually asking them till now :-)

> 
> -- 
>       Viktor.
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
> 

--
There were such things as dwarf gods. Dwarfs were not a naturally religious 
species, but in a world where pit props could crack without warning and pockets 
of fire damp could suddenly explode they'd seen the need for gods as the sort 
of supernatural equivalent of a hard hat. Besides, when you hit your thumb with 
an eight-pound hammer it's nice to be able to blaspheme. It takes a very 
special and straong-minded kind of atheist to jump up and down with their hand 
clasped under their other armpit and shout, "Oh, 
random-fluctuations-in-the-space-time-continuum!" or "Aaargh, 
primitive-and-outmoded-concept on a crutch!"
  -- Terry Pratchett


_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to