On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dear Chairs, > > I updated the acronym document based on WG feedback. > Can you please start a WGLC as from my viewpoint the document is complete. Apologies for the delay in responding. Olafur, would you mind first submitting as a WG document? (The chairs believe that we saw sufficient support in Berlin that we feel comfortable just adopting it…). W > > Olafur > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: [email protected] >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dane-registry-acronym-01.txt >> Date: September 6, 2013 10:53:53 AM EDT >> To: Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-dane-registry-acronym-01.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Olafur Gudmundsson and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-dane-registry-acronym >> Revision: 01 >> Title: Adding acronyms to simplify DANE conversations >> Creation date: 2013-09-06 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Number of pages: 5 >> URL: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dane-registry-acronym-01.txt >> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dane-registry-acronym >> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dane-registry-acronym-01 >> Diff: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dane-registry-acronym-01 >> >> Abstract: >> Experience has show that people get confused using the three numeric >> fields the TLSA record. This document specifies descriptive acronyms >> for the three numeric fields in the TLSA records. > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane -- With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
