Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> writes: >> _666._tcp.first.example. TLSA 3 1 1 {blob} >> _666._tcp.first.example. TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob} >> >> Something needs to be said for that case; what would an existing >> implementation do? drop both? take one? Either way, it should be >> discussed/mentioned. > > I'm confused I thought these were just user friendly names... The > wire format of the DNS TLSA record is surely unchanged. In which > case it is impossible to publish the second form, it is just an > input format in documentation (and perhaps source form zone files > in supporting DNS servers), but not a wire format.
I did actually mean to respond to that and say such, because I realized that shortly afterward. Sorry. (though the zone file is still affected, I don't know of any software that does partial reads of zone files and only takes the records it can understand) -- Wes Hardaker Parsons _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
