Sure, that's arguable. My main reason for suggesting UTA is that I figure its drafts will have more/soonest dependencies on the terminology draft.
However, if folk prefer saag, for now at least that's fine. But let's drop the cross-posting to dane then please? (Which I bcc'd) S. On 03/12/2014 09:56 PM, Stephen Kent wrote: > Stephen, > >> (again, I'd suggest one list for this if we can and the >> UTA wg list, but hopefully that'll settle down when there's >> an I-D, and since I'm not the boss of us anyway...:-) >> > This is a broader topic than TLS, as later messages from Joe indicated, so > I don't think UTA is the right place for this discussion. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
